Nobody enjoys losing a top performer. As a leader, it can be a heavy blow, particularly when the person is a critical player on your team. When faced with these tough goodbyes, we might ask ourselves – “What could I have done differently? Is there a chance they might stay?”

Over the course of my career in leadership I’ve had a number employees find their next great opportunity outside of the organization. When a talented individual who had significantly contributed to the team, receives an enticing offer from a major tech company and the salary bump is substantial, there’s not much I as a leader can do. Nor should I, I have always tried to build teams that are a great place to work and a great place to “have worked”. I want folks in my organizations to be able to look back and say, “I’m glad I worked there, look where it got me”. And we as leaders can look at that huge pay bump and say, look how great our culture was that they held out this long. However it’s still hard to lose top talent, all of the experience and context can be hard to replace. But instead of dwelling on the inevitable, decide to use this opportunity to learn more about why they are leaving and if there were factors beyond the salary that motivated this decision.

We all chase success, often associating it with relentless work and perpetual busyness. But in doing so, we might find ourselves on the cusp of burnout, a state of chronic physical and emotional exhaustion. The book “Peak Performance” sheds light on this very conundrum, offering insights into sustainable high performance. One of the book’s vital lessons is the intricacies of burnout and how it intertwines with every facet of our lives.

Introduction

Leadership intricately weaves with the dynamics of power when influencing teams, partner departments, the organization, and even customers, especially in Security Engineering. The Manager Tools podcasts introduced me to this paradigm of role power, highlighting the research by French and Raven on power types. Just as Aunt May wisely stated, “With great power comes great responsibility.” As a budding manager, it’s pivotal to understand the interplay between newfound power and core values. Prioritize empathy, honesty, and transparency – not just because they’re morally right, but because they’re profoundly effective.

As we progress into an era of increasing cybersecurity threats and expanding digital footprints, the need for effective threat intelligence cannot be overstated. In our previous posts, we’ve explored the vast potential of AI, specifically OpenAI’s GPT-4, in bolstering our information security stance. From crafting policies to assisting with third-party vendor assessments, we’ve seen first-hand how this powerful AI model can streamline and enrich various aspects of a robust cybersecurity program. Today, we’re diving deeper and unveiling our newest addition: ChatGPT for Threat Intelligence.

When it comes to startup operations, one aspect that can often be overlooked in the early stages is the development of a comprehensive and robust policy library. This is especially important when considering information policies, which govern the use, management, and security of data and technology in your organization. Establishing these policies not only sets clear expectations for employees but also assures customers about your company’s commitment to security and reliability. Using AI like my GPT-4 GRC approach can streamline this process.

In a previous post, we explored the vast potential of OpenAI’s GPT-4 in the information security space, specifically how it could augment security teams by running third-party vendor assessment with ChatGPT. We now turn the theoretical into practical by sharing our experience of running a vendor security assessment.

Building a policy library from scratch can be a daunting task, but with GPT-4, we’ve streamlined the process. The key was to converse with the AI model to create a comprehensive set of policies that are easy to understand and align with best security practices. The policies cover topics ranging from Information Security, Change Management, Incident Response, Disaster Recovery, and Third-Party Vendor Assessment.

Opening

‘The First 90 Days’ by Michael D. Watkins is a powerful guide for any leader stepping into a new role. Whether you’re the one transitioning into a new job or a manager looking to onboard a new hire effectively, the book offers invaluable insights and a robust framework for success.

This post contains affiliate links, which means I may receive a small commission, at no extra cost to you, if you make a purchase using these links.

As the adoption of Chromebooks in enterprise security continues to rise, so does the demand for robust productivity solutions tailored for these devices. In the earlier post, we explored the fundamental security advantages of Chromebooks and touched upon the potential of using them as enterprise computers. Now, we delve into the realm of power users and address a key management challenge inherent to ChromeOS’s Linux container and how you can manage Crostini with Ansible.

When we mention enterprise computers, most of us instantly picture the typical Windows or macOS systems. But in this blog, I aim to challenge the norm and introduce an often-overlooked contender: Chromebooks. ChromeOS’s unique security features combined with a lightweight design make Chromebooks a compelling tool for modern businesses. Let’s delve deeper into why Chromebooks could be an intriguing choice for your enterprise security.

Understanding Chromebooks for Enterprise Security: A Secure Paradigm Shift

Chromebooks have the potential to revolutionize the security aspect of enterprise computing with their unique features. Verified boot ensures that the system hasn’t been tampered with at the start, while the design, resistant to traditional executable files, minimizes the attack surface, thereby reducing malware risks significantly.

As the cybersecurity landscape rapidly evolves, leveraging the most advanced tools is no longer optional – it’s imperative. One such emerging technology garnering attention is large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3. Thanks to their ability to understand and generate human-like text, LLMs offer exciting opportunities to streamline and enhance various aspects of a cybersecurity program. However, as with any technology, they come with their own set of challenges and risks that need to be managed carefully before adding a tool like ChatGPT in Cybersecurity programs.